Evidence Hub

Study protocol for a multicenter, multinational prospective randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes in subjects with Gram-negative bacteremia who have blood culture evaluation using Fast Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing vs. standard of care testing: the FAST trial

Banerjee R, Komarow L, Li Y, Wu Q, Sanchez-Gonzalez L, Mau D, Abbenante E, Schwager N et al.

Trials, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Background: Novel, rapid blood culture diagnostics can provide faster antibiotic susceptibility results (AST) compared to standard methods but their impact on clinical outcomes is unclear and not assessed in many prospective clinical trials.

Methods: This study is a two-arm, multicenter, multinational, prospective randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in countries with high antibiotic resistance rates including Greece, India, Israel, and Spain. Nine hundred hospitalized subjects who have blood cultures collected as part of routine clinical care with growth of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) will be randomized 1:1 to blood culture evaluation using standard of care (SOC) AST vs. a rapid phenotypic AST method, VITEK REVEAL™ in addition to SOC AST. Subjects in both study arms will be reviewed by antibiotic stewardship clinicians who will recommend changes to antibiotic therapy, if indicated. The primary outcome is a composite three-category Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) defined using three ordered levels: alive without deleterious events, alive with at least one deleterious event, and death. Key secondary outcomes include mortality, length of stay, and time to antibiotic escalation or de-escalation within 3 days of randomization. Exploratory outcomes include a five-category DOOR, categorial agreement between VITEK REVEAL™ and SOC testing, clinician compliance with antibiotic stewardship recommendations, and desirability of treatment selection based on antibiotic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free