Evidence Hub

Psychometric properties of the self-care of chronic illness inventory in Chinese older adults with multiple chronic conditions

Yuanyuan Jin, Roger L. Brown, M. Bhattarai, Wan-chin Kuo, Ying Chen

International Journal of Older People Nursing, 2023

240 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Existing self-care measures for the Chinese population are specific to single chronic conditions. No generic self-care measures exist for the Chinese population with multiple chronic conditions.

OBJECTIVES

To test the structural validity, concurrent validity and reliability of the Self-care of Chronic Illness Inventory (SC-CII) in Chinese older adults with multiple chronic conditions.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guideline. A diverse sample of Chinese older adults with multiple chronic conditions (n = 240) was recruited. Structural validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was investigated with hypotheses testing of the relationships between perceived stress, resilience and self-care. Reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. Finally, a simultaneous confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the general model with all items and all three subscales.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor structure of the self-care maintenance and self-care management subscales and the one-factor structure of the self-care monitoring subscale. Concurrent validity was supported by the significant negative correlation (r ranged from -0.18 to -0.38, p < .01) with perceived stress and the significant positive correlation (r ranged from 0.31 to 0.47, p < .01) with resilience. Reliability…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 240 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free