Evidence Hub

Trends and implications of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Insights from a 19-year study in Zhejiang Province

Li J, Wang Y, Liu P, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Zhao S, He J, Zhao C et al.

Medicine, 2024

Abstract

This study aimed to elucidate the resistance trends of P. aeruginosa isolates from 2005 to 2023 in Zhejiang Province, emphasizing the impact of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on antimicrobial resistance patterns and clinical management. We retrospectively analyzed 7326 P. aeruginosa isolates collected from diverse clinical sources in a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang Province from 2005 to 2023. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing of each isolate were performed using the VITEK-32 automated system and the disk diffusion method, following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. We assessed resistance patterns for key antibiotic classes relevant to P. aeruginosa treatment, including carbapenems, β-lactams, aminoglycosides, and quinolones. Statistical analyses, including trend evaluations and resistance determinant assessments, were conducted in R software (version 4.2.2), with visualizations generated through ggplot2 to illustrate resistance trends over time. This study focused on key anti-pseudomonal agents including carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem), β-lactams (piperacillin), and quinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin). We observed a progressive increase in resistance to imipenem from 6.8% in 2005 to 48.2% in 2023 and meropenem from 25.4% to 44.2% over the same period. Conversely, resistance rates to aminoglycosides declined, with gentamicin resistance dropping from 22.0% in 2005 to 5.0% in 2019. Cephalosporins exhibited variable…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free