Evidence Hub

Belantamab mafodotin, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for intermediate-fit and frail patients with newly diagnosed myeloma

Terpos E, Gavriatopoulou M, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Malandrakis P, Fotiou D, Kanellias N, Migkou M, Theodorakakou F et al.

Blood, 2026

42 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Abstract: The phase 1/2 BelaRd (belantamab mafodotin [belamaf], lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of belamaf combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in unfit and frail transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Part 1 (n = 36) established a recommended belamaf phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 1.9 mg/kg every 8 weeks (median follow-up, 39.3 months). In part 2, 30 patients were randomized 1:1 in group A (n = 15), where belamaf dosing was guided by ophthalmologist-assessed ocular adverse events (OAEs), whereas in group B (n = 15), belamaf dosing was based on hematologist-led vision-related anamnestic (VRA) tool and ophthalmologist-assessed grade ≥3 OAEs. Among the RP2D patients (n = 42), overall response rate was 97.6%, median progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival have not been reached yet, and the 18-month PFS and time to progression rates were 83.0% and 97.2%, respectively. Ocular toxicities were similar between assessments by hematologists and ophthalmologists, and no ophthalmologist withholding of a hematologist-led dosing occurred. Less than 1% of patients stopped driving/reading because of OAEs. Median time to belamaf reinfusion was 13 weeks. Overall, BelaRd is an effective regimen for transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM and warrants a phase 3 study in this setting. OAEs' impact on quality of life appears limited, and implementation of the hematologist-led VRA tool may eventually reduce…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 42 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free