Evidence Hub

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Clofazimine in Children With Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis

Hughes JA, Solans BP, Garcia-Prats AJ, Draper HR, Schaaf HS, Nielsen JC, Nortier E, Courtney I et al.

The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025

5 citations

Abstract

Background: We described the pharmacokinetics and safety of clofazimine in children treated for multidrug/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB).

Methods: Children aged <18 years were eligible. Clofazimine was administered by weight-based dosing. Sparse and semi-intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was completed at baseline and weeks 2 and 16. Clofazimine weekly area under the concentration time-curve (wAUC) was compared with the target wAUC (60.87 mg × h/L and 111.79 mg × h/L) in adults receiving clofazimine (100 mg) daily for MDR/RR-TB and leprosy, respectively. Safety monitoring included measurement of QT interval prolongation and laboratory assessment.

Results: Twenty children were included: median age was 6.0 years (IQR, 1.6-14.4); 6 (30%) were male. Median clofazimine wAUC was 162.94 (IQR, 130.06-263.95), >25% higher than the target adult wAUC in adults with MDR/RR-TB (111.79; IQR, 81.9-151.9). No serious or grade ≥3 cardiac events occurred. There was a QT interval increase of 0.02 milliseconds for every 1-µg/L increase in clofazimine concentration. One severe adverse event (elevated alanine transferase) led to temporary withdrawal of clofazimine.

Conclusions: The clofazimine doses used achieved substantially higher exposures in children than adults receiving standard clofazimine doses. The association of higher clofazimine exposures and QT interval prolongation may pose unnecessary risk to children, particularly in combination with other QT-prolonging drugs.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free