Evidence Hub

Enteral nutrition with supplemental arginine, RNA, and omega-3 fatty acids in patients after operation: immunologic, metabolic, and clinical outcome

Jeanette M. Daly, M D Lieberman, J Goldfine, Jian Shou, F Weintraub, Ernest F. Rosato, PT Lavin

PubMed, 1992

85 participants · 552 citations

Abstract

The individual nutrients arginine, RNA, and omega-3 fatty acids improve immune function, but prospective trials have not demonstrated their effects on clinical outcome. Patients (n = 85) who underwent operation for upper gastrointestinal malignancies were randomized to receive the supplemental diet or a standard enteral diet after surgery. Clinical patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. Mean caloric intakes (1421 vs 1285 kcal/day) were similar between groups. Mean nitrogen intakes (15.6 vs 9.0 gm/day) and nitrogen balances (-2.2 vs -6.6 gm/day) measured in the first 20 patients were significantly greater in the supplemented group than in the standard group (p = 0.05). In vitro lymphocyte mitogenesis was measured in the first 31 patients and was decreased on postoperative day 1 in both groups, but normal levels were regained only in the supplemented group. In the cohort of 77 eligible patients, infectious and wound complications occurred significantly less often (11% vs 37%) in the supplemented group than in the standard group (p = 0.02). Linear logistic models for infectious/wound complications with control for the amount of nitrogen suggested (p = 0.10) dietary treatment as the major factor. Mean length of stay in the hospital was significantly shorter (p = 0.01) for the supplemented group (15.8 +/- 5.1 days) than for the standard group (20.2 +/- 9.4 days). These results suggest that postoperative enteral nutrition with supplemental arginine, RNA, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 85 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free