Evidence Hub

Efficacy and in vitro activity of gepotidacin against bacterial uropathogens, including drug-resistant phenotypes, in females with uncomplicated urinary tract infections: results from two global, pivotal, phase 3 trials (EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3)

Scangarella-Oman NE, Butler DL, Breton J, Brown D, Kasapidis C, Millns H, Huang C, Perry CR et al.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2025

5 citations

Abstract

Two recent Phase 3 trials demonstrated the efficacy of gepotidacin compared with nitrofurantoin to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) in females. Pretreatment urine specimens were obtained from all participants. Based on pooled trial data (treatment groups combined), central laboratory culture results identified 1,421 (45%) participants with ≥1 baseline qualifying (≥105 CFU/mL) uropathogen (i.e., pooled microbiological Intent-to-Treat population). Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis were the most common qualifying uropathogens. Among 1,159 E. coli isolates, 28%, 28%, 15%, and 28% were fluoroquinolone resistant (FQ-R), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistant (SXT-R), extended-spectrum β-lactamase positive (ESBL+), and multidrug resistant (MDR), respectively. For 114 K. pneumoniae isolates, 25%, 23%, 16%, and 16% were nitrofurantoin resistant, SXT-R, FQ-R, and ESBL+, respectively. Of 67 P. mirabilis isolates, 25%, 21%, and 31% were SXT-R, FQ-R, and MDR, respectively. Gepotidacin MIC90 values against all qualifying uropathogens and drug-resistant phenotypes ranged from 0.25 to 32 µg/mL, with no isolates of Enterobacterales, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, or Enterococcus faecalis considered resistant to gepotidacin. For all uropathogen drug-resistant phenotypes, gepotidacin MIC90 values were similar (i.e., lower, equal to, or 1-dilution higher) compared with the MIC90 of the overall species. Gepotidacin's efficacy, based on…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free