Evidence Hub

Rifasutenizol-based triple therapy versus bismuth plus clarithromycin-based triple therapy for first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in China (EVEREST-HP): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, triple-dummy, double-blind, controlled, non-inferiority trial

Song Z, Zhou L, Wang W, Lan C, Tang T, Xie J, Fan H, Wang X et al.

The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2026

700 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Background: Rifasutenizol (TNP-2198) is a new molecular entity with a synergistic dual mechanism of action under clinical development for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a rifasutenizol-based triple therapy (RTT) versus bismuth plus clarithromycin-based triple therapy (BCTT) for the treatment of H pylori infection in treatment-naive patients.

Methods: EVEREST-HP was a phase 3, randomised, triple-dummy, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial with adaptive design for sample size re-estimation conducted at 40 research hospitals in China. Treatment-naive patients aged 18-65 years, with a positive [13C]urea breath test ([13C]UBT), further confirmed by gastric biopsy and histological examination, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive RTT (rifasutenizol 400 mg oral capsules, amoxicillin 1 g oral capsules, and rabeprazole 20 mg enteric-coated tables) or BCTT (bismuth potassium citrate 240 mg oral tablets, clarithromycin 500 mg oral tablets, amoxicillin 1 g oral capsules, and rabeprazole 20 mg enteric-coated tablets), all twice a day for 14 days. Randomisation was done centrally by a secure interactive web response system using block sizes of two or four and stratified by study site. RTT was compared against BCTT using a triple-dummy approach to ensure masking. The primary endpoint was H pylori eradication rate based on [13C]UBT 4-6 weeks after the end of treatment in the modified intention-to-treat…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 700 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free