Evidence Hub

Left vagus nerve magnetic stimulation facilitates nasogastric tube removal in post-stroke patients with dysphagia: a prospective observational cohort study

Shu-Juan Huang, Lirong Liu, Caixia Ouyang, Huimin Han, Yong Luo, Weifeng Wen, Si Chen, Han-Bo Chen

Frontiers in Neurology, 2026

78 participants

Abstract

Background Post-stroke pharyngeal dysphagia (PSD) frequently leads to aspiration, aspiration pneumonia, and malnutrition, significantly compromising patient outcomes. Although standard swallowing rehabilitation training is widely applied, many patients show slow recovery with prolonged nasogastric tube placement. Recently, neuromodulation techniques such as vagus nerve magnetic stimulation (VNMS) have shown promise; however, observational evidence supporting its real-world clinical efficacy in post-stroke dysphagia patients remains limited. Methods This single-blind prospective observational cohort study was conducted from June 2024 to June 2025 at Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital, China. A total of 78 stroke patients with dysphagia were enrolled (33 in intervention group, 45 in control group). The intervention group received left-sided VNMS combined with standard swallowing rehabilitation training, while the control group received standard training alone. Multiple confounder adjustment and causal inference approaches were applied to ensure the robustness of the results. Results Among 78 patients, after confounder adjustment, the intervention group demonstrated a significantly higher nasogastric tube removal rate, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.850 (95% CI: 1.103–3.101, p = 0.021). The intervention group removed nasogastric tubes on average 3.75 days earlier than the control group (95% CI: −5.01 to −2.50, p = 0.000), and the direction of effect was consistent across all…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 78 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free