Evidence Hub

Investigation of wind load behavior on hip roof structures subjected to Tornado-induced flow

Hao X, Jia Y, Wang X, Cao W, Zhang Z

PloS one, 2026

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of ground roughness, building orientation, swirl ratio, and radial position on the wind loads of hip roof buildings under tornado conditions. The simulation results (CFD) presented herein were compared with validated simulations, existing experimental data, and field measurements to validate the accuracy of the modelling approach. The most unfavorable vortex ratio affecting the hipped roof was identified through an analysis of the wind pressure coefficient under typical vortex ratios. The wind load characteristics at specific roof locations were examined by comparing radial distances. The influence of orientation angle on turbulent structures and wind pressure distribution within the wind field was investigated through comparative analysis of different aspects. This study investigates the influence of ground roughness on wind pressure and mean aerodynamic force over hipped roofs through computational analysis. Results indicate that increased surface roughness reduces the proportion of upward airflow, causing wind field characteristics to approach those of smooth surfaces. When the building orientation is 90°, the maximum negative pressure occurs at the leeward ridge junction due to minimal airflow separation and windward area. At the maximum core radius, airflow directly impacts the windward surface, inducing flow separation and vortex formation, which generates substantial vortices on the roof's leeward side. These findings provide…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free