Evidence Hub

Effects of bronchoalveolar lavage on pediatric refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia complicated with atelectasis: a prospective case-control study

Fang Li, B. Zhu, Guihui Xie, Yan Wang, Ji Geng

Minerva Pediatrica, 2020

225 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a paucity of data about the therapeutic efficacy of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for pediatric refractory Mycoplasma pneumonia pneumonia (RMPP) complicated with atelectasis. This study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of BAL in pediatric RMPP inpatients complicated with atelectasis.

METHODS

Totally 225 children diagnosed as having RMPP with radiological proven irreversible atelectasis completed this study. According to whether they received BAL treatment, they were divided into BAL-intervention group (n=125) and the control group (n=100). Clinical, laboratory and radiological effects were compared between these two groups. Bronchoscopic imaging features were also comprehensively investigated.

RESULTS

Compared with control group, the febrile days after enrollment was significantly shorter in BAL-intervention group (3.0±1.6 d) compared with that in control group (4.1±1.7 d) (P<0.01). The duration of coughing was 3.1±1.7 d in BAL-intervention group and 4.6±1.8 days in the control group (P<0.01). The duration of abnormal lung auscultation was 3.8±1.8 d in intervention group and 5.8±1.6 d in the control group (P<0.01). The length of hospital stays was 5.8±1.6 days and 7.8±1.9 days (P<0.01), respectively. We also found that WBC count (P<0.01) and CRP value (P<0.01) recovered more quickly in BAL-intervention group compared with that in the control group. Seven days after admission, 85.6% of patients in BAL-intervention group showed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 225 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free