Evidence Hub

Safety and efficacy of continuous intrathecal baclofen via cervical catheter tip: a retrospective case series

James M. Mossner, Sunny Abdelmageed, Megan Votoupal, Jennifer Misasi, Nour B Saleh, Klaudia Dziugan, Timothy Krater, Jeffrey S. Raskin

Neurosurgical Focus, 2024

25 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) is an effective treatment for hypertonia in children involving the implantation of a pump and catheter system. The highest concentration of ITB is at the catheter tip. The catheter tip location is most commonly within the lumbar or thoracic spine. The cervical tip location has traditionally been avoided because of concerns of hypoventilation and pneumonia; however, these complications in cervical compared with thoracic or lumbar placement have not been reliably proven. Some studies have suggested that cervical ITB location better treats upper-extremity hypertonia. There are limited data describing the safety and efficacy of cervical ITB on hypertonia. The authors present a single-institution retrospective case series highlighting the safety and efficacy of using cervical ITB location for the treatment of hypertonia.

METHODS

Retrospective data analysis was performed for children who underwent continuous dosing cervical ITB between April 2022 and October 2023. Nonmodifiable risk factors, clinical variables, operative characteristics, and adverse outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

This study included 25 patients (8 female). The mean age at implantation was 12.4 years, and the mean operative duration was 90 minutes. The mean Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale score decreased by 9.5 points (p = 0.01). The mean aggregated modified Ashworth scale score in the upper extremities decreased by 2.14 points (p = 0.04), and that in the lower extremities…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 25 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free