Evidence Hub

On the transport of a suspended particle in flow through the entrance region of a tube

Wang SK, Chen LS, Hwang NH

Biorheology, 1994

Abstract

The motion of a single, spherical particle, released at different radial positions at the inlet of the entrance region of a straight circular laminar flow tube (Re = 260), was studied theoretically. Radial migration of the particle, either toward the tube center or toward the tube wall, was predicted. Based on the hypothesis that the particle experienced a lift force which was produced by the vorticity in the boundary layer and a velocity difference between the center of the suspended particle and the fluid medium, an inertia-vorticity fluid dynamic model was formulated to analyze the particle radial motions. Computational flow dynamics (CFD) solutions obtained from a 9.8 mm diameter tube model included the resulting particle loci for three particle radii (a = 0.1 cm, 0.085 cm, 0.050 cm), with the particle entry at various radial positions. The computation also covered a range of different particle entry speeds. The results showed that the particle migrates toward the tube center if it lags behind the medium in the core region; otherwise, it migrates toward the tube wall. Additional flow experiments were conducted in a circular (2R = 10.2 mm), 300 mm long straight tube. A small polystyrene sphere (2a = 1.72 mm, density rho p = 1.014 g.cm-3) was released at the inlet (X = 0, eta/R = 0.48) with two dimesionless release velocities (omega p = 0, and omega p > 1.0). The recorded particle traces agree well with the computational model.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in animal and computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free