Evidence Hub

Cyto-Genotoxic Impacts of Antimony Tin Oxide (ATO) Nanoparticles on Allium cepa Root Meristem Cells: An Integrative Experimental and in Silico Approach

Liman R, Istifli ES, Acikbas Y, Yeltekin Uğur Y, Suciu M, Barbu-Tudoran L, Ciğerci IBH

ACS omega, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

In this study, antimony tin oxide (ATO) nanoparticles (NPs) were evaluated for their cyto-genotoxic effects on Allium cepa root tips, as their widespread use in industrial and electronic applications raises concerns about possible environmental release and biological hazards that remain largely unexplored. The ATO NPs were characterized using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray diffraction (XRD), confirming high structural uniformity and crystallinity. Root tips were exposed to 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL of ATO NPs for 4 h, and cyto-genotoxicity was assessed using the Allium anaphase-telophase and alkaline comet assays. ATO NPs caused a significant concentration-dependent decrease in mitotic index (MI) and an increase in chromosomal aberrations (CAs) such as laggards, bridges, stickiness, and polyploidy along with DNA damage, indicating suppressed cell division and genotoxic potential of ATO NPs in plant cells, respectively. SEM and TEM analysis also revealed morphological alterations in treated roots compared to controls. In computational docking, the ATO NP showed more favorable predicted affinities against the colchicine-binding site of the tubulin heterodimer (ΔG = -11.06 kcal/mol) and the synthetic B-DNA dodecamer (ΔG = -12.07 kcal/mol) than colchicine and methylmethanesulfonate (MMS), respectively, suggesting a possible dual genotoxic pathway involving microtubule perturbation and DNA…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free