Evidence Hub

High-dose inhaled NO for the prevention of nosocomial pneumonia after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass: A proof-of-concept prospective randomised study

T. P. Kalashnikova, N. Kamenshchikov, Yu. A. Arsenyeva, Y. K. Podoksenov, I. V. Kravchenko, M. S. Kozulin, M. A. Tyo, E. A. Churilina et al.

Pulmonology, 2025

74 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the safety and potential efficacy of high-dose inhaled nitric oxide therapy for the prevention of postoperative pneumonia in cardiac surgery patients.

METHODS

A prospective randomised controlled pilot study included 74 patients with moderate risk of postoperative pneumonia after elective cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients were randomised into two groups. The main group (NO-group) (n = 37) received inhaled nitric oxide at a dose of 200 ppm for 30 minutes 2 times a day for 5 days or until pneumonia developed. The control group received conventional postoperative care (n = 37). The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative pneumonia during in-hospital stay.

RESULTS

Preventive nitric oxide inhalations were associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative nosocomial pneumonia (2 (5.4%) cases in the main group (NO-group) vs. 9 (24.3%) cases in the control group, p = 0.046; OR = 0.178, 95% CI = 0.036-0.89)). There was no decrease in either peak expiratory flow, or peak inspiratory flow in comparison with the preoperative values in the NO-group. Inhaled nitric oxide therapy is safe. It did not lead to an increase in the incidence of acute kidney injury.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose inhaled nitric oxide therapy is safe and effective for the prevention of postoperative nosocomial pneumonia in cardiac surgery.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 74 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free