Evidence Hub

An observational study on multidrug resistance in pediatric patients with urinary tract infections

Attar GBE, Ahmed S, Shree N, Khan A, Saha N, Khan MA

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026

80 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Pediatric urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common cause of morbidity, with Escherichia coli as the leading pathogen. Rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR) complicates management, particularly in resource-limited settings where data is scarce. A cross-sectional study was conducted over six months among 80 children (< 18 years) with culture-confirmed UTIs at a tertiary care hospital. Uropathogens were identified using standard biochemical and automated methods, and antibacterial susceptibility was assessed by VITEK 2 and disk diffusion per CLSI guidelines. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to ≥ 1 agent in ≥ 3 antibacterial classes. UTIs were most frequent in early childhood (62.5%), with a higher prevalence in females (58.8%). Gram-negative organisms accounted for 81.3% of isolates. Escherichia coli (58.8%) was the predominant uropathogen, followed by Enterococcus spp. (17.5%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (10.0%). Escherichia coli demonstrated high resistance to nalidixic acid (84.4%), ampicillin (78.1%), and ciprofloxacin (78.1%), while maintaining high susceptibility to fosfomycin (90.6%), ertapenem (81.3%), gentamicin (71.9%), and nitrofurantoin (71.9%). Enterococcus spp. exhibited high resistance to tetracycline (64.3%), and levofloxacin (63%). but remained sensitive to linezolid (93.27%), vancomycin (85.71%), teicoplanin (78.57%), and tigecycline (71.4%). A substantial proportion of isolates were multidrug-resistant, limiting therapeutic options.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 80 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free