Evidence Hub

Clinical value of transthoracic ultrasonography in identifying causes of acute dyspnea: a cross-sectional analysis

Ahmed A. Abd Elmoniem, Afaf A. Elkader, Marawan N Mohamed, M. Abdel-Tawab

Egyptian Journal of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis, 2026

Abstract

Dyspnea encompasses a wide range of subjective respiratory sensations. Its inherently subjective nature presents a significant challenge for clinicians. The purpose of this study is to describe the varoius sonographic patterns observed in this population and assess the diagnostic efficacy of transthoracic ultrasonography in patients who arrive at the emergency room with acute dyspnea.

One hundred fifty patients were included in the study. Their age is more than 18 years and they suffer from acute dyspnea. Any patient with subcutaneous emphysema or morbid obesity was excluded. All patients were subjected to the following: a full medical history and the dyspnea graded by the NYHA classification, complete laboratory investigations, imaging includes transthoracic ultrasound, and high-resolution computed tomography or computed tomography angiography.

The study identified distinct lung ultrasound profiles corresponding to various diseases. The A-profile was predominantly observed in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, while the A’-profile was most frequently associated with pneumothorax. Patients with consolidation, lung mass, and pulmonary embolism with infarction typically exhibited the C-profile. The B-profile was characteristic of interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary edema, and in selected cases, pneumonia.

The diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound for specific conditions demonstrated notable accuracy with high sensitivity and specificity.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free