Evidence Hub

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Assess the Impact of Natalizumab Versus Fingolimod on Central Nervous System Tissue Damage and Recovery in Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Subjects

ClinicalTrials.gov · TERMINATED, 2016

111 participants

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to assess the effect of natalizumab compared to fingolimod on the evolution of new on-treatment T1-gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions to persistent black holes (PBH) over 52 weeks. The secondary objectives of this study in this study population are to assess the effect of natalizumab compared to fingolimod on: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of central nervous system (CNS) tissue destruction as measured by the number of new T1-Gd+ lesions; various other MRI measures of disease activity; No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA); Relapse on treatment over 52 weeks; The change in information processing speed as measured by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT).

Conditions: Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Primary outcome: Cumulative Number of ≥ 6-Month Confirmed T1-Hypointense Lesions Arising From New On-Treatment T1-Gadolinium-Enhancing (Gd+) Lesions.

Enrollment: 111 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 111 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free