Evidence Hub

P-1499. Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes Associated with Meropenem/Vaborbactam Treatment in Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Pneumonia

Kaylee E. Caniff, Chloe Judd, Taryn A. Eubank, K. Garey, Tamara Krekel, W. Kufel, Justin A Andrade, John Cerenzio et al.

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Background Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a major public health threat due to increasing prevalence and limited effective treatment options. Meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) is a beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor agent designed to treat CRE. There is a paucity of data related to patient characteristics and associated outcomes with the utilization of M/V in pneumonia due to CRE. The objective of this study was to describe real-world experience with M/V in this setting. Methods This is a retrospective, observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study of patients ≥ 18 years old who received M/V for ≥ 72 hours for clinically-diagnosed hospital-acquired (HAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to CRE between 6/2020-2/2024. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as resolution or improvement in signs/symptoms of infection and without the need for additional therapy. The secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, 30-day microbiologic recurrence, 30-day symptomatic recurrence and adverse drug reaction(s). Results Sixty-two patients were included from six U.S. medical centers. The mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 58.2 (15.4) years; patients were predominantly male (71.0%) and Caucasian (58.1%). At time of culture collection, the mean (SD) APACHE II score was 22.1 (7.8) and most patients (78.0%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the predominant species isolated in culture (43.5%). Notably, 65.6%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free