Evidence Hub

Global Variation in Predictors of Uptake of Conservative Kidney Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Rosenberg KL, Mukadam N, Paterson G, Sneddon J, Xu D, Anwari K, Burns A, Caplin B

Journal of renal care, 2026

51,872 participants

Abstract

Background: For older people and those with more comorbidities, kidney replacement therapy may not offer a mortality benefit. Conservative kidney management represents an alternative treatment pathway for kidney failure without dialysis.

Objectives: To identify the clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with choosing a non-dialysis care pathway and to explore geographical variation.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched. Studies, which included patients with kidney failure choosing non-dialysis care and a comparator group of patients preparing for or receiving kidney replacement therapy, were selected. Exposures included clinical and socioeconomic factors. The outcome was a choice to have non-dialysis care. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed; with subgroup analysis by region.

Results: In total 43 studies, including 51,872 participants, were selected. Female sex was associated with choosing non-dialysis care (pooled OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.26-1.71). There was no overall association between non-white ethnicity and treatment choice in Western countries. However, in North America non-White groups had lower odds of receiving non-dialysis care compared to white patients (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60-0.81). Socioeconomic deprivation was associated with choosing non-dialysis care in Asia, as was low educational attainment (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.54-5.26). There was an overall association between living alone and non-dialysis care (pooled OR 1.55, 95% CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 51,872 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free