Evidence Hub

Neuroimaging markers and disability scales in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mirmosayyeb O, Yazdan Panah M, Mokary Y, Mohammadi M, Moases Ghaffary E, Shaygannejad V, Weinstock-Guttman B, Zivadinov R et al.

PloS one, 2024

7 citations

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a central nervous system disorder marked by progressive neurological impairments. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters are key paraclinical measures that play a crucial role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of MS-related disability. This study aims to analyze and summarize the existing literature on the correlation between MRI parameters and disability in people with MS (pwMS).

Methods: The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to July 19, 2024, and a meta-analysis was carried out using R software version 4.4.0 and the random effects model used to determine the pooled correlation coefficient, with its 95% confidence interval (CI), between MRI measurements and disability scales.

Results: Among 5741 studies, 383 studies with 39707 pwMS were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) had significant correlations with cervical cord volume (r = -0.51, 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.38, I2 = 0%, p-heterogeneity = 0.86, p-value<0.01), cortical lesion volume (r = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.53, I2 = 68%, p-heterogeneity<0.01, p-value<0.01), brain volume (r = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.47 to -0.33, I2 = 41%, p-heterogeneity = 0.05, p-value<0.05), and grey matter volume (GMV) (r = -0.36, 95% CI: -0.49 to -0.21, I2 = 0%, p-heterogeneity = 0.53, p-value<0.01), respectively.

Conclusion: This study offers evidence suggesting that cortical lesion volume, brain…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free