Evidence Hub

Transseptal Access to the Left Atrium: Tips and Tricks to Keep it Safe Derived from Single Operator Experience and Review of the Literature

Manolis AS

Current cardiology reviews, 2017

249 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

Background: Transseptal puncture (TSP) remains a demanding procedural step in accessing the left atrium with inherent risks and safety concerns, mostly related to cardiac tamponade.

Objective: Based on our own experience with 249 TSP procedures and in-depth literature review, we present our results and offer several tips and tricks that may render TSP successful and safe.

Methods: This prospective study comprised 249 consecutive patients (146 men), aged 41.6±17.4 years, undergoing TSP by a single operator for ablation of a variety of arrhythmias, mostly related to left accessory pathways (n=145) or left atrial tachycardias (n=33) and more recently, atrial fibrillation (n=70). TSP was guided by fluoroscopy alone in all patients without the use of echocardiography imaging. In addition, an extensive literature review of TSP-related topics was carried out in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar.

Results: Among 249 patients, 33 patients were children or young adolescents (aged 7-18 years); 14 patients were undergoing a repeat procedure. Patients with a manifest accessory pathway were the youngest (mean age 33.7±15.9) and patients with atrial fibrillation the oldest (mean age 56.0±10.8 years). A successful TSP was accomplished in 247 patients (99.2%). Two (0.8%) procedures were complicated by cardiac tamponade managed successfully with pericardiocentesis or surgical drainage. Review of the literature revealed no systematic reviews and meta-analyses of TSP studies; however, several…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 249 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free