Evidence Hub

Prevalence and moderators of depression symptoms among black individuals in Western Countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis among 1.3 million people in 421 studies

J. Cénat, Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Moshirian Farahi, Léa Gakima, Joana N. Mukunzi, W. Darius, David Guangyu Diao, Farid Mansoub Bekarkhanechi, Anaïse Dalcé et al.

The Lancet Regional Health - Americas, 2025

1,305,366 participants · 22 citations

Abstract

Summary Background Black people living in Western countries face a range of structural challenges and disparities (e.g. difficult socio-economic conditions, historical and intergenerational trauma, police brutality, racism) that adversely affect their mental health. This study assesses depression prevalence among Black individuals in minority contexts, examining sociodemographic factors, study type, evaluation period, publication year, and measures; and differences in depression rates between Black individuals and other racial groups (Asian, Indigenous, Latinx, White). Methods To identify studies, a comprehensive search strategy was developed and executed on September 30, 2022 across six databases (Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL. Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE). The meta-analysis protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020155634). A random-effects meta-analysis estimated depression prevalence among Black individuals. Meta-regression tested differences by racial background, gender, sample type, evaluation method, age group, and publication year, reporting Odd ratios (ORs) with Confidence intervals (CIs). Findings From 21,215 citations, 421 studies were included with a sample of 1,305,366 Black individuals (411 studies were conducted in North America, 9 in Europe, and one in both Europe and North America). Pooled prevalence was 20.2% (95% CI: 18.7%–21.7%) among Black individuals, 13.4% (95% CI: 10.2–16.9) among Asians, 21.0% (95% CI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,305,366 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free