Evidence Hub

Macular Buckle, Vitrectomy or combined approach for the management of Macular Hole Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Jasmine Yaowei Ge, Alvin Wei Jun Teo, Andrew S. H. Tsai, Gavin Siew Wei Tan, Shu Y. Lee, Cheung Ning, Wei-Chi Wu, Y. Hwang et al.

Ophthalmology Retina, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

TOPIC

There is no consensus regarding management of macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD). Techniques such as trans pars plana vitrectomy (TPPV), macular buckle (MB), and combined approach have been described.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

To review anatomical and functional outcomes of different surgical interventions for MHRD.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration number CRD42024586953). Literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases and clinical trial databases for randomized controlled trials or retrospective comparative studies reporting MHRD outcomes until 15th February 2025. Retinal reattachment rates, macular hole closure rates, functional outcomes, and complications were assessed. Frequentist Meta-Analysis of Proportions and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) were conducted. Study quality was assessed with Cochrane's ROBINS-I V2 tool and RoB 2 tool.

RESULTS

5 studies and 308 eyes were analysed. Retinal reattachment rates were significantly higher in combined (96.9%) and MB (96.2%) versus vitrectomy (66.9%). There was no significant difference between combined and MB (p = 0.802; RR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.12; Tau2 = 0.00, I2 = 0.00; GRADE - moderate certainty, 4 studies, 173 eyes), while TPPV did significantly worse relative to MB (p < 0.001; RR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.79; Tau2 = 0.00, I2 = 0.00; GRADE - moderate certainty, 4 studies, 233 eyes). Macular hole closure rates…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free