Evidence Hub

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis

K. Black, Sylvie Bowden, P. Chu, Caitlin McClurg, S. Pin, Amy Metcalfe

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2024

9 citations

Abstract

Objective Venous thromboembolism is associated with significant patient morbidity, mortality, and can lead to delays in treatment for patients with cancer. The objectives of this study were to identify the incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and identify risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Methods A systematic literature search of biomedical databases, including Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Embase was performed on December 6, 2022 and updated on December 21, 2023 for peer reviewed articles. Studies were included if they were cohort studies or randomized controlled trials that evaluated the incidence of venous thromboembolism for patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale for cohort studies and the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool results across studies. Results A total of 2636 studies were screened, and 11 were included in the review. Ten were retrospective cohort studies, and one was a randomized controlled trial. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in the included studies ranged from 0% to 18.9%. The pooled incidence rate of venous thromboembolism was 10% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7% to 13%). This remained significant when restricted to only studies with a low risk of bias (pooled incidence of 11%,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free