Evidence Hub

Meta-analysis: Are Psychotherapies Less Effective for Black Youth in Communities With Higher Levels of Anti-Black Racism?

Maggi A. Price, J. Weisz, Sarah C. McKetta, Nathan L. Hollinsaid, Micah R. Lattanner, Allecia E. Reid, M. Hatzenbuehler

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2021

14,081 participants · 66 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We examined whether anti-Black cultural racism moderates the efficacy of psychotherapy interventions among youth.

METHOD

We analyzed a subset of studies from a previous meta-analysis of five decades of youth psychotherapy randomized controlled trials. Studies were published in English between 1963 and 2017 and identified through a systematic search. The 194 studies (N = 14,081; ages 2-19) across 34 states comprised 2,678 effect sizes (ESs) measuring mental health problems (e.g., depression) targeted by interventions. Anti-Black cultural racism was operationalized using a composite index of 31 items measuring explicit racial attitudes (obtained from publicly available sources; e.g., General Social Survey), aggregated to the state level and linked to the meta-analytic database. Analyses were conducted with samples of majority (i.e., ≥50%) Black (n = 36 studies) and majority-White (n = 158 studies) youth.

RESULTS

Two-level random effects meta-regression analyses indicated that higher anti-Black cultural racism was associated with lower ESs for studies with majority-Black youth (β = -0.2, 95% CI: -0.35, -0.04, p = .02) but was unrelated to ESs for studies with majority-White youth (β = 0.0004, 95% CI: -0.03, 0.03, p = .98), controlling for relevant area-level covariates. In studies with majority-Black youth, mean ESs were significantly lower in states with the highest anti-Black cultural racism (>1 SD above the mean; g = 0.19) compared to states with the lowest racism…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 14,081 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free