Evidence Hub

A co-designed systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of grief interventions for anxiety and depression in young people

L. Breen, D. Greene, C. Rees, Amy Black, M. Cawthorne, S. Egan

Journal of Affective Disorders, 2023

2,803 participants · 27 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Grief in young people is common and associated with symptoms of anxiety and depression, yet grief interventions for this age group are under-researched.

METHOD

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of grief interventions in young people. The process was co-designed with young people and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PsycINFO, Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched in July 2021 (updated December 2022).

RESULTS

We extracted results from 28 studies of grief interventions with young people (14-24 years) that measured anxiety and/or depression (N = 2803 participants, 60 % girls/women). Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for grief demonstrated a large effect for anxiety and medium effect for depression. Meta-regression indicated that CBT for grief that included a higher degree of CBT strategies, was not trauma focused, had >10 sessions, offered on an individual basis, and did not involve parents, was associated with larger effect sizes for anxiety. Supportive therapy had a moderate effect for anxiety and a small-moderate effect for depression. Writing interventions were not effective for anxiety or depression.

LIMITATIONS

Studies are limited in number and there were few randomized controlled studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate that CBT for grief is an effective intervention for reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression in young people…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,803 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free