Evidence Hub

Endoscopic and intrathecal management of intraventricular fungal infections: a case report of Cladophialophora bantiana and systematic review

Oros J, Takroni R, Aljoghaiman MSA, Pierre C, Brown DF, Czabanka M, Monteith S

BMC infectious diseases, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraventricular fungal infections are rare and associated with high morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is often delayed due to nonspecific clinical and radiological findings, and treatment is complicated by limited cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration of systemic antifungal agents. Neuroendoscopic visualization and intrathecal antifungal therapy have been reported only sporadically, and standardized management strategies are lacking. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 75-year-old male who developed a right temporal lobe abscess caused by Cladophialophora bantiana, confirmed by histopathology, culture, and molecular diagnostics. Despite prolonged systemic antifungal therapy, the patient demonstrated clinical and radiographic progression with intraventricular ventriculitis. Neuroendoscopy enabled direct visualization of pigmented intraventricular fungal lesions, targeted biopsy, ventricular lavage, and placement of an Ommaya reservoir, allowing initiation of intrathecal liposomal amphotericin B with serial CSF drug level monitoring and subsequent radiographic stabilization. To contextualize this case, we performed a systematic literature review of intraventricular fungal infections managed with endoscopic procedures and/or intrathecal or intraventricular antifungal therapy, identifying eleven cases involving Aspergillus spp., Cladophialophora bantiana, Mucorales, and other dematiaceous fungi. Management strategies were highly individualized and typically combined…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free