Evidence Hub

Effects of EEG neurofeedback and training interventions on golf putting performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Li Z, Liu H, Liu C, Liu F, Liu B

Frontiers in psychology, 2026

424 participants

Abstract

Background: Electroencephalography neurofeedback (EEG-NFT) is used to modulate brain function to enhance golf putting performance. However, the effectiveness of EEG-NFT and its relationship with non-EEG training interventions in improving putting performance remain unclear.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration (CRD420251068586), this study systematically searched multiple databases up to 8 June 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating EEG-NFT and other training interventions for golf putting were included. The meta-analyses employed random-effects models, with subgroup analyses conducted to examine moderators.

Results: A total of 12 RCTs involving 424 participants were included. The overall analysis revealed a significant positive effect on putting performance (standardized mean difference, SMD = 1.33; 95% CI: 0.36-2.29; p = 0.007), though with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 94%). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that skill level significantly moderated the intervention effects (p = 0.0003), with novices showing the largest improvement (SMD = 2.10). Crucially, intervention efficacy was strongly dependent on both the anatomical specificity and frequency band targeting: central region-sensorimotor rhythm (Cz-SMR)-NFT demonstrated robust positive effects (SMD = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.59-1.66), while inhibitory…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 424 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free