Evidence Hub

The Impact of Strength Changes on Active Function Following Botulinum Neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A): A Systematic Review

Gill R, Banky M, Yang Z, Medina Mena P, Woo CCA, Bryant A, Olver J, Moore E et al.

Toxins, 2025

677 participants

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) injections are effective in reducing focal limb spasticity; however, their impact on strength and active function needs to be established. This review was a secondary analysis aimed at evaluating changes to active function in the context of muscle strength changes following BoNT-A intramuscular injection for adult upper and lower limb spasticity. The original review searched eight databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PEDro, PubMed, Web of Science) and was conducted with methodology that followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines as described in section 6.2 of Gill et al. For this secondary analysis, no databases were searched; only further data were extracted. The current and preceding review were registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42022315241). Twenty studies were screened for inclusion, and three studies were excluded because active function was not assessed in all participants. Seventeen studies (677 participants) met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Quality was examined using the PEDro scale and modified Downs and Black checklist and rated as fair to good. Pre- and post-BoNT-A injection strength (agonist, antagonist, and global), active function (activity), participation, and quality-of-life outcomes at short-, mid-, and long-term time points were extracted and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 677 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free