Evidence Hub

Upper limb motor recovery in chronic stroke-longitudinal aggregate analysis from control group outcomes

Scalzo F, Coker RA, Souders L, Petrossian L, Bhugra K, Sheehan L, Leuthardt EC, Carter AR

Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025

368 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines the effects of regular physical activity on upper extremity motor recovery during the late subacute and chronic phases of stroke.

Methods: Data were aggregated from 20 studies comprising 368 participants in control groups receiving usual care or general rehabilitation without specialized interventions. To isolate the impact of non-specific physical activity, studies involving robotics or task-specific therapies were excluded.

Results: The primary outcome was the change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) motor scale. The pooled effect size for FMA-UE change was small and non-significant (Cohen's d = 0.11, 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.26, p > 0.05), indicating that general physical activity alone may result in limited improvements in upper extremity function in chronic stroke. Heterogeneity across studies was low, and no evidence of publication bias was found.

Discussion: These findings provide a quantitative benchmark for expected gains from general activity and offer a reference for interpreting outcomes in future stroke rehabilitation trials lacking control groups.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 368 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free