Evidence Hub

Changes of resistance rates in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains are unrelated to antimicrobial consumption in ICU populations with invasive device-related infection

Álvarez-Lerma F, Olaechea-Astigarraga P, Gimeno R, Catalan M, Nuvials X, Gracia-Arnilla MP, Palomar-Martínez M, Seijas-Betolaza I et al.

Medicina intensiva, 2020

11,652 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between antipseudomonal antibiotic consumption and each individual drug resistance rate in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains causing ICU acquired invasive device-related infections (IDRI).

DESIGN: A post hoc analysis was made of the data collected prospectively from the ENVIN-HELICS registry.

SETTING: Intensive Care Units participating in the ENVIN-UCI registry between the years 2007 and 2016 (3-month registry each year).

PATIENTS: Patients admitted for over 24h.

MAIN VARIABLES: Annual linear and nonlinear trends of resistance rates of P. aeruginosa strains identified in IDRI and days of treatment of each antipseudomonal antibiotic family per 1000 occupied ICU bed days (DOT) were calculated.

RESULTS: A total of 15,095 episodes of IDRI were diagnosed in 11,652 patients (6.2% out of a total of 187,100). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was identified in 2095 (13.6%) of 15,432 pathogens causing IDRI. Resistance increased significantly over the study period for piperacillin-tazobactam (P<0.001), imipenem (P=0.016), meropenem (P=0.004), ceftazidime (P=0.005) and cefepime (P=0.015), while variations in resistance rates for amikacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and colistin proved nonsignificant. A significant DOT decrease was observed for aminoglycosides (P<0.001), cephalosporins (P<0.001), quinolones (P<0.001) and carbapenems (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: No significant association was observed between consumption of each antipseudomonal antibiotic family and…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free