Evidence Hub

Facedown Positioning Following Surgery for Large Full-Thickness Macular Hole: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Pasu S, Bell L, Zenasni Z, Lanz D, Simmonds IA, Thompson A, Yorston D, Laidlaw DAH et al.

JAMA ophthalmology, 2020

185 participants · 31 citations

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The value of facedown positioning following surgery for large full-thickness macular holes is unknown.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether advice to position facedown postoperatively improves the outcome for large macular holes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized, parallel group superiority trial with 1:1 randomization stratified by site with 3 months' follow-up was conducted at 9 sites across the United Kingdom and included participants with an idiopathic full-thickness macular hole of at least 400 μm minimum linear diameter and a duration of fewer than 12 months. All participants had vitrectomy surgery with peeling of the internal limiting membrane and injection of perfluoropropane (14%) gas, with or without simultaneous surgery for cataract.

INTERVENTIONS: Following surgery, participants were randomly advised to position either facedown or face forward for 8 hours daily for 5 days.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was closure of the macular hole determined 3 months following surgery by masked optical coherence tomography evaluation. Secondary outcome measures at 3 months were visual acuity, participant-reported experience of positioning, and quality of life measured by the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25.

RESULTS: A total of 185 participants (45 men [24.3%]; 156 white [84.3%]; 9 black [4.9%]; 10 Asian [5.4%]; median age, 69 years [interquartile range, 64-73 years]) were randomized. Macular hole closure was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 185 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free