Evidence Hub

Fampridine for Symptomatic Treatment in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study

Hansen PN, Markvardsen L, Tankisi H, Andersen H, Krøigård T, Sindrup S

Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS, 2026

Abstract

Background and aims: Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated neuropathy that may cause persistent disability despite immunoglobulin treatment. Ion channel dysfunction has been demonstrated in CIDP, but no therapies specifically target this mechanism. We investigated whether fampridine improves clinical function and electrophysiological measures in CIDP patients with residual symptoms.

Methods: In this two-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, patients with CIDP receiving stable subcutaneous or intravenous immunoglobulin were assigned to 4 weeks of fampridine (10 mg twice daily) or placebo, separated by a washout period. Co-primary outcomes were changes in Six-Spot-Step Test (SSST) and Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT). Secondary outcomes included clinical scores, patient-reported outcomes, nerve conduction studies, and nerve excitability testing.

Results: Twenty-eight patients were included in the study. No significant differences were observed between fampridine and placebo for SSST (p = 0.154) or 9-HPT (p = 0.857). Grip strength and R-ODS worsened during fampridine compared with placebo (Bonferroni-adjusted p = 0.007 for both), while other clinical outcomes showed no differences. Median nerve CMAP amplitude with proximal stimulation increased significantly during fampridine treatment (adjusted p = 0.040). No significant changes were observed in other electrophysiological variables, including nerve excitability…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free