Evidence Hub

Locked plate versus modified clamp-rod internal fixation for feline corpus ilium fractures: A comparative clinical study

Saylak N, Yayla S, Altan S, Ersöz-Kanay B, Çatalkaya E

Veterinary surgery : VS, 2026

18 participants

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the applicability and clinical effectiveness of a modified clamp-rod internal fixation (M-CRIF) system compared with conventional locking plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of feline corpus ilium fractures.

Study design: Prospective, controlled clinical study.

Animals: Thirty-six client-owned cats with corpus ilium fractures.

Methods: Cats were randomly assigned to two groups: Group I (M-CRIF, n = 18) and Group II (locking plate, n = 18). All fractures were stabilized with a lateral approach. Radiographic healing, sacral index (SI), and complications were assessed at postoperative days 21, 45, 60, and 120. Long-term outcomes were assessed using owner questionnaires addressing mobility and defecation.

Results: Fracture union was achieved in all cats. Healing scores increased over time in both groups (p < .05). At day 45, Group I showed higher healing scores than Group II (p = .002). Sacral index narrowing was lower in Group I (p = .005). Implant-related complications occurred in 22.2% (4/18) of cats in the plate group, including screw loosening and one revision surgery, whereas no screw loosening was observed in the M-CRIF group. Preoperative neurological deficits were present in 22.2% of cats, decreasing to 5.5% postoperatively. Owner questionnaires indicated satisfactory mobility, although some discrepancies with clinical and radiographic findings were observed.

Conclusion: The M-CRIF system provided greater stability, fewer complications, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 18 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free