Evidence Hub

Vascular Comorbidities and an Increased Comorbidity Score Are Associated With Disability and Disability Progression in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

John NA, Li Y, Angelis F, Carrasco FP, Stutters J, Doshi A, Calvi A, Plantone D et al.

European journal of neurology, 2026

445 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Vascular risk factors are associated with increased disease activity and disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). This has been studied mainly in cohorts with relapsing-remitting MS. However, the association between vascular comorbidities (VCM) and clinical disability in secondary progressive MS (SPMS) is less well studied. Our aim was to investigate the association between VCM, non-VCM, comorbidity burden and both physical and cognitive performance in SPMS.

Methods: Longitudinal analysis of 445 patients from the MS secondary progressive multi-arm trial (MS-SMART)-a multi-arm multicentre phase-2b randomised placebo-controlled trial of three agents in SPMS (NCT01910259). VCM (hypertension and hyperlipidaemia) and non-VCM (asthma, hypothyroidism and osteoporosis) were recorded. A comorbidity score was also determined (0, 1, ≥ 2). Physical disability and processing speed were assessed at baseline, 48- and 96 weeks. Multiple linear regression and mixed models were used to investigate the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between baseline VCM, non-VCM, comorbidity score and clinical outcome measures.

Results: The cohort was predominantly female (67%), median Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 6.0. 13% and 9% had hypertension and hyperlipidaemia (VCM), respectively. 7%, 9% and 5% had asthma, hypothyroidism and osteoporosis (non-VCM), respectively. Co-morbidity counts were 0,63%; 1, 23% and with > = 2, 11%. In cross-sectional models, both…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 445 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free