Evidence Hub

Bispecific 10E8.4/iMab broadly neutralizing antibody in people with or without HIV-1: a partially randomized phase 1 trial

Theodore DA, Mayer BT, Rolle CP, DeJesus E, Ackerman ME, Seaman MS, Weiner JA, Mohri H et al.

Nature medicine, 2026

54 participants

Abstract

Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) are a promising tool for HIV prevention and treatment. Here we conducted a first-in-human, phase 1 trial of the bispecific 10E8.4/iMab antibody, which consists of a 10E8.4 arm binding the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein membrane-proximal external region and an ibalizumab (iMab) arm binding the human CD4 molecule. 10E8.4/iMab was administered intravenously (IV) or subcutaneously (SC). Safety/tolerability within 2 weeks of 10E8.4/iMab administration (primary outcome) and the pharmacokinetics (PK), antiviral activity, induction of anti-10E8.4/iMab antibodies, longitudinal CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts and long-term safety (secondary outcomes) were evaluated. 54 participants living with HIV (PLWH) or without HIV (PLWoH) received 10E8.4/iMab or placebo. In arm 1, PLWoH received 10E8.4/iMab 0.3 mg kg-1 IV, 1 mg kg-1 SC, or 1 mg kg-1 IV (n = 3 each). In arm 2, PLWoH received 10E8.4/iMab 3 mg kg-1 IV, 10 mg kg-1 IV or 30 mg kg-1 IV (n = 6 each). In arms 3/3a, PLWH received 10E8.4/iMab 10 mg kg-1 IV (n = 3) or 30 mg kg-1 IV (n = 6). In arm 4, PLWoH were randomized to receive 10E8.4/iMab or placebo 2.5 mg kg-1 SC or 10 mg kg-1 SC (n = 9 each). Participants in arms 1-3 were not randomized. No treatment-related serious adverse events (AEs) or AEs ≥ grade 3 were reported. The most common solicited AEs were tenderness (10/54, 18.5%), fatigue (18/54, 33.3%) and headache (12/54, 22.2%). Related grade 2 local and systemic solicited AEs occurred in one and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 54 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free