Evidence Hub

Assessment of Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Volume-Dependent Conductive Hearing Loss in Healthy Volunteers: First-in-Human, Open-Label, Placebo-Controlled Study of a Single Intratympanic Injection of AC102

Lanting C, Robijn S, Nieratschker M, Galetzka C, Meis A, Rommelspacher H, Ahoud-Schoenmakers S, Lackner E et al.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of the intratympanic delivery of AC102, a novel pharmaceutical therapy based on a thermosensitive gel for preventing and treating a range of hearing impairments, including sudden sensorineural hearing loss. We studied this in healthy, normal-hearing volunteers to evaluate any change in hearing thresholds.

Study design: An open-label, placebo-controlled, ascending single-dose, multicenter phase 1 clinical trial.

Setting: The study was conducted in two centers (blinded for reviewing purposes).

Subjects: Forty-two normal-hearing healthy volunteers younger than 40 years of age were eligible for enrollment in the study.

Intervention: A single intratympanic injection of a thermosensitive gel, either a placebo or containing AC102, to the middle ear.

Main outcome measure: The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of a single intratympanic injection of ascending volume of placebo and ascending volume and concentration of AC102. The secondary objective was to determine single-dose pharmacokinetics of intratympanically injected AC102 and to evaluate any change in hearing thresholds in healthy male and female subjects.

Results: The intratympanic delivery of AC102 thermogel was safe and well tolerated in healthy volunteers with normal hearing, with no permanent adverse events recorded. A mild and temporary volume-dependent conductive hearing loss in the higher frequencies…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free