Evidence Hub

Frequency of retinal findings after 8 years in the Bifocal Lenses in Nearsighted Kids (BLINK) Study

Schulle KL, Sinnott LT, Orr DJ, Fenton RL, Jones-Jordan LA, Berntsen DA, Mutti DO, Walline JJ et al.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025

235 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to report the frequency of retinal findings in myopic children and determine the association with the amount of myopia or axial length.

Design: The BLINK study was a myopia control, multi-centre randomised clinical trial following myopic children with multifocal soft contact lenses.

Participants: Children aged 7-11 years with myopia (sphere) from -0.75 to -5.00 D and 1.00 D cylinder or less at baseline who completed the final BLINK2 study visit (n = 235).

Methods: Children had an annual dilated fundus examination. Retinal findings were classified into three main categories: vitreous, peripheral retina and other retinal findings, and further subdivided into 17 subcategories.

Main outcome measures: Frequencies were calculated. Groups used median splits of spherical equivalent refractive error and axial length, and differences were assessed using chi-squared tests. Incidence was calculated.

Results: Overall, 186/235 (79.1%) participants had at least one retinal finding and 81/235 (34.5%) participants had at least one vitreous or peripheral retinal finding that could increase the risk of sight-threatening complications. One participant had a retinal detachment. The incidence of any retinal finding in those with no previous findings was 12.5/100 person-years (95% confidence interval = 10.2-15.0). Peripheral retinal finding incidence was 2.4/100 person-years (1.8-3.2), while the vitreous finding incidence was 1.7/100 person-years (1.2-2.4). At…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 235 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free