Evidence Hub

Mirror visual feedback as therapeutic modality in unilateral upper extremity complex regional pain syndrome type I: randomized controlled trial

Machač S, Chasáková L, Kakawand S, Kozák J, Štěpánek L, Vejvalka J, Kolář P, Černý R

European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2024

8 citations

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence for the effectiveness of mirror therapy (MT) on pain reduction in patients with type I complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS I).

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of MT on pain reduction and hand function in subjects with unilateral upper extremity CRPS I.

Design: Randomized controlled trial with control group cross-over (half cross-over design).

Setting: Subjects with CRPS I were outpatients of a university hospital and cooperating centers. All patients carried out the daily exercise at home.

Population: Subjects with unilateral upper extremity CRPS I meeting the Budapest diagnostic criteria.

Methods: Subjects were randomly divided into two groups. Group A (N.=13) carried out a ten-minute MT exercise daily, for a total duration of six weeks. Group B (N.=14) acted as a control group for six weeks followed by six weeks of MT with the same characteristics as Group A. Upper extremity active range of motion, strength, dexterity, limb volume, affected-to-unaffected hand temperature difference, and health-related quality of life were evaluated before and after each period. Daily records on the visual analogue scale were used for pain evaluation. Effectiveness was calculated using mixed-effects modelling for between-group comparisons and within-group variability, and identification of significant predictors.

Results: Twenty-three females and four males with an average age of 56.1±9.6 years completed the study. Except for the affected-to-unaffected…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free