Evidence Hub

Effects of three fluoroquinolones on QT analysis after standard treatment courses

Tsikouris JP, Peeters MJ, Cox CD, Meyerrose GE, Seifert CF

Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc, 2006

13 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolone (FQ) agents have been speculated to influence the risk of Torsades de pointes (Tdp). Methods of evaluating this risk are varied and not systematic. QTc interval (QTc) prolongation is the most commonly used marker of Tdp, but has questionable utility. QT dispersion (QTd) may be a more selective marker of Tdp. No assessment of QTd for FQs has been reported. The current study evaluates the effects of three commonly prescribed FQs by comprehensive QT analysis.

METHODS: In an open-label crossover study, 13 healthy participants received 3 treatments in random order: ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily, levofloxacin 500 mg once daily, and moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily. Each treatment was given for 7 days with a 1-week washout period. Twelve-lead electrocardiographic measurements were performed prior to the first dose, 2 hours after the first dose, and following the 7-day medication course. QTc prolongation was determined by measurement of lead II, and QTd from the difference between the maximum and minimum QTc intervals among the 12 leads. The data were analyzed using Friedman ANOVA, with the Wilcoxon signed rank test post hoc analysis, with P < 0.05 significance.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: No difference was seen in baseline QTc (P = 0.48) or QTd (P = 0.92). Following 7 days of moxifloxacin, the QTc was prolonged by 6 ms relative to baseline (408 ms, P = 0.022), and 11 ms from the 2-hour measurement (403 ms, P = 0.003). Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin had no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free