Evidence Hub

Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial of Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder With 13 Month Follow-up

L. Arnold, M. Arns, J. Barterian, Rachel A. Bergman, Sarah R. Black, C. Conners, Shea Connor, Sudeshna Dasgupta et al.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2020

144 participants · 95 citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether theta/beta-ratio (TBR) electroencephalographic biofeedback (neurofeedback, NF) has a specific effect on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) beyond nonspecific benefit. Method: In a 2-site double-blind randomized clinical trial, 144 children age 7–10 with rigorously diagnosed moderate/severe ADHD and theta/beta-ratio (TBR)≥4.5 were randomized 3:2 to deliberate TBR downtraining vs. a control of equal duration, intensity, and appearance. Two early dropouts left 142 for modified intent-to-treat analysis. The control utilized pre-recorded EEGs with participant’s artifacts superimposed. Treatment was programmed via internet by an off-site statistician-guided co-investigator. Fidelity was 98.7% by trainers/therapists, 93.2% by NF expert monitor. Primary outcome was parent- and teacher-rated inattention; analysis was mixed-effects regression. Because expense and effort of NF can be justified only by enduring benefit, follow-ups were integrated. Results: Blinding was excellent. While both groups showed significant improvement (p<0.001, d=1.5) in parent/teacher rated inattention from baseline to treatment-end and 13-month follow-up, NF was not significantly superior to the control condition at either time point on this primary outcome (d=0.01, p=0.965 at treatment end; d=0.23, p=.412 at 13-month follow-up). Responders (CGI-I=1–2) were 61% of NF and 54% of Controls (p=.36). Adverse events were distributed proportionally between treatments.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 144 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free