Evidence Hub

Combination of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam Effectively Treated Post-Cardiac Surgery Pneumonia Caused by Hypervirulent KPC- and NDM-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Case Report

Wei Q, Cong R, Shen C, Chen C, Cao Z, Ren C, Liu T

Infection and drug resistance, 2026

Abstract

Background: Hypervirulent carbapenem‑resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (hv-CRKP) co‑producing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase‑2 (KPC‑2) and New Delhi metallo‑β‑lactamase‑1 (NDM‑1) represents a serious clinical threat due to limited treatment options and high mortality. This study aimed to describe the clinical course, microbiological characteristics, and therapeutic outcome of a severe postoperative pneumonia caused by such a strain, and to evaluate the effectiveness of combination antimicrobial therapy.

Case presentation: A 59‑year‑old woman developed severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome following cardiac surgery. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid culture yielded carbapenem‑resistant K. pneumoniae. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed resistance to meropenem (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≥16 μg/mL), ceftazidime‑avibactam (CZA) (MIC ≥16/4 μg/mL), and aztreonam (ATM) (MIC ≥64 μg/mL). Molecular analysis identified bla KPC and bla NDM carbapenemase genes and hypervirulence‑associated genes including rmpA and iucA. In vitro synergy testing demonstrated a marked reduction in MIC (≤1 μg/mL) when CZA was combined with ATM. Based on these findings, combination therapy was initiated, resulting in rapid clinical improvement, a decline in procalcitonin levels from 4.83 ng/mL to 0.5 ng/mL, radiographic resolution of pulmonary infiltrates, and sustained microbiological clearance.

Conclusion: This case demonstrates that CZA combined with ATM may be an…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free