Evidence Hub

Two Years of Ocrelizumab Treatment in Black and Hispanic People with Multiple Sclerosis in CHIMES: A Single-Arm Clinical Trial

Amezcua L, Reder AT, Bernitsas E, Monson NL, Vartanian T, Wu GF, Saleh M, Okai A et al.

Annals of neurology, 2026

69 participants

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ocrelizumab in self-identified black and Hispanic people with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Methods: The Characterization of Ocrelizumab in Minorities with Multiple Sclerosis (CHIMES) trial, a prospective, open-label, single-arm, phase 4 study, intentionally recruited underrepresented populations in the US, Puerto Rico, and Kenya. Black and Hispanic people with relapsing multiple sclerosis aged 18-65 years with Expanded Disability Status Scale score 0-5.5 received ocrelizumab for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with no evidence of disease activity in 3 components at week 48: protocol-defined relapse, 24-week confirmed disability progression, and disease activity on magnetic resonance imaging.

Results: Of 113 black and 69 Hispanic people with relapsing multiple sclerosis, most were women (72%), with a mean age of 35.5 (SD 10.5) years, body mass index of 31.0 (SD 7.4) kg/m2, and Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 2.4 (SD 1.4). Genetic ancestry aligned with self-identified race or ethnicity. At week 48, 50.5% of CHIMES participants had no evidence of disease activity, including 94.5% free from 24-week confirmed disability progression, 95.1% free from relapse, 95.6% free from T1-contrast-enhancing lesions, and 52.7% free from new/enlarging T2 lesions. Serious adverse events were experienced by 8.2%, and 2.2% discontinued treatment. Infusion-related reactions were more frequent in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 69 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free