Evidence Hub

The TRaditional versus Early Aggressive Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis (TREAT-MS) trial: design and baseline characteristics of participants

Mowry EM, Qian P, Meador W, Lynch S, Narayan R, Borazanci A, Robertson D, Qureshi S et al.

Contemporary clinical trials, 2025

900 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Background: Whether early use of higher-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) reduces later risk of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) has not been studied as a prospective treatment strategy. Herein, we describe the TRaditional versus Early Aggressive Therapy for MS (TREAT-MS) trial design and provide the baseline characteristics of the enrolled population.

Methods: TREAT-MS is a pragmatic, randomized, rater-blinded trial of DMT strategies in treatment-naive people aged 18-60 years with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Participants were randomized (1:1, stratified by site and long-term disability risk classification) to one of two treatment strategies: higher-efficacy or traditional DMT; the specific DMT within the assigned strategy was chosen by the clinician/patient pair. Participants could switch DMT for breakthrough disease occurring after 6 months on DMT. The primary outcome is sustained worsening of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)-plus, a composite endpoint that includes the EDSS and the timed 25-ft walk and 9-hole peg tests.

Results: TREAT-MS includes 900 people with the following baseline characteristics: mean age 36 ± 10 years; 629 (70 %) female gender; 648 (72 %) white, 168 (19 %) Black/African American race, and 105 (12 %) Hispanic or Latino. Mean time since MS symptom onset was 2.6 (± 4.5) years, and mean EDSS score was 2.5 (± 1.3).

Conclusion: TREAT-MS seeks to address how early DMT strategy influences MS disability and related outcomes. The…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 900 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free