Evidence Hub

First-in-human study of lomvastomig, a PD-1-TIM-3 bispecific antibody, in patients with advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors

Rohrberg KS, Melero I, F Sanmamed M, Muñoz-Couselo E, Cervantes A, Gambardella V, Greillier L, Garrido P et al.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026

39 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: This first-in-human clinical study explored lomvastomig, an immunoglobulin G1-based Fc-silenced bispecific antibody that simultaneously blocks the immune checkpoint receptors programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3.

Methods: Lomvastomig was characterized in cell cultures and preclinically in cancer mouse models. The phase 1, open-label, multicenter clinical study of lomvastomig included a dose-escalation part in patients with advanced and/or metastatic solid tumors and an expansion part with four tumor-specific cohorts, which enrolled checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-experienced patients with melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and CPI-naïve patients with SCLC and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Primary and secondary objectives included safety/tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended dose for expansion (RDE), pharmacokinetics, drug receptor occupancy, and antitumor activity.

Results: 39 and 95 patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation and expansion parts, respectively. Lomvastomig was well tolerated up to the highest tested dose of 2,100 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W). One dose-limiting toxicity was reported at 1,200 mg (grade 3 troponin T increase). No MTD was reached, and 2,100 mg Q2W was established as the RDE. Linear pharmacokinetics across the studied dose range suggested target saturation. Peripheral blood drug receptor occupancy on CD3+ and CD8+ was saturated at >90% throughout…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 39 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free