Evidence Hub

Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: Effectiveness and Safety

Suárez-Casillas P, Mejías-Trueba M, Martínez Alemany I, Navarro Amuedo L, Praena Segovia J, de Alarcón González A, Luque Márquez R, Palacios-Baena ZR et al.

Pharmaceutics, 2026

290 participants

Abstract

Objective: Given the increasing use of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) and the clinical challenges posed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of OPAT for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections in a real-world cohort. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study with retrospective analysis including adult patients with P. aeruginosa infections treated within a multidisciplinary OPAT program shared by two tertiary hospitals between November 2012 and December 2024. Clinical characteristics, infection type, antimicrobial therapy, resistance patterns, source control, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Primary outcomes were treatment failure during OPAT and within 30 days after OPAT completion. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and vascular access complications. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with treatment failure. Results: A total of 290 patients were included. The most frequent infections were bronchiectasis exacerbations (39.7%) and complicated urinary tract infections (15.2%). Most patients received monotherapy (72.8%), mainly ceftazidime, while 27.2% received combination therapy with a beta-lactam plus an aminoglycoside. Treatment failure occurred in 7.6% of patients during OPAT and in 15.5% within 30 days after OPAT completion, with an overall clinical success rate of 77%. Male sex and chronic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 290 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free