Evidence Hub

Safety and performance of a novel synthetic biomimetic scaffold for iliac crest defect reconstruction during surgical treatment of pelvic girdle pain: a first-in-human trial

Giannoudis PV, Andrzejwski P, Chloros G, Hensor EMA

British medical bulletin, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical treatment of pelvic girdle pain (PGP) involves arthrodesis of sacroiliac (SI) and pubic symphysis joints. Fusion of pubic symphysis involves the implantation of an autologous iliac crest tricortical graft harvested from the iliac crest. The objective was to assess the safety of a novel synthetic graft substitute (b.Bone) for iliac crest reconstruction and to evaluate the results of PGP surgical treatment.

Sources of data: Consecutive participants undergoing pelvic fusion and requiring iliac crest reconstruction were enrolled and followed-up for 12 months in a prospective first-in-human clinical investigation. Adverse events were documented, and health-related quality of life was evaluated using EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire. Iliac crest defect healing was evaluated by the Modified Lane and Sandhu radiological scoring system. In addition, relevant published peer-reviewed scientific articles identified from PubMed.

Areas of agreement: The EQ-5D-5L scores improved steadily reaching the highest point at 365 days. By 365 days complete healing of the bone defect was observed.

Areas of controversy: The management of PGP remains challenging with mixed results reported in the literature.

Growing points: While there is lack of consensus on how to manage PGP, the present study shows improved outcomes at one year following surgery. The synthetic b.Bone scaffold is a safe option with good healing outcomes for iliac crest defect reconstruction.

Areas timely for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free