Evidence Hub

Interceptor® long-lasting insecticidal net: phase III evaluation over three years of household use and calibration with Phase II experimental hut outcomes

Tungu P, Kirby M, Malima R, Kisinza W, Magesa S, Maxwell C, Batengana B, Pigeon O et al.

Parasites & vectors, 2016

8 citations

Abstract

Background: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LN) are an effective tool for malaria prevention. The World Health Organization Pesticide Evaluation Scheme has established evaluation criteria to facilitate registration for public use. A household randomised trial was conducted in Tanzania according to WHOPES Phase III procedures to evaluate the alpha-cypermethrin coated Interceptor® LN (BASF) over three years' use. Outcomes were calibrated against results of Phase II experimental hut trials.

Methods: Interceptor LN (200 mg/m(2) alpha-cypermethrin) and conventionally treated nets CTN (40 mg/m(2) alpha-cypermethrin) were randomly distributed to 934 households. At 6-monthly intervals, household surveys recorded net use, durability, adverse effects, user acceptance and washing practices. Concurrently, 30 nets of each type were collected and tested for knock-down and kill of Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes in cone and tunnel bioassays. Alpha-cypermethrin content of nets was assessed annually.

Results: At 12 months 97% of Interceptor LN met the efficacy criteria by cone or tunnel test; this pass rate declined to 90% at 24 months and 87% at 36 months. In contrast only 63% of CTN met the efficacy criteria at 12 months, 14 % at 24 months and 0% at 36 months. The alpha-cypermethrin content at 36 months on Interceptor LN was 20% (42 ± 13 mg/m(2)) of the initial content but on CTNs only 4% (1.3 ± 1.6 mg/m(2)) remained. Interceptor LN was reported to be used year-round and washed 4.3…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free