Evidence Hub

Unveiling inequities in representation: Racial disparities in supportive care breast cancer clinical trial enrollment

K. Reyes, Bryan Hill-Fung Lau, Felicia Tang, Bianca Gardner, Kathleen L. Cui, Evelin Trejo, Ana I. Velazquez Manana

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2024

2 citations

Abstract

1605 Background: Supportive care is an integral part of breast cancer survivorship care. However, not much is known if there is adequate representation of racial minorities in supportive care breast cancer (BC) clinical trials (CTs). Methods: We conducted a systematic review of supportive care CTs for patients with BC using Covidence. A search of clinicaltrials.gov identified 2695 CTs, of which 173 met inclusion criteria. The SEER database was used as a racial distribution data reference for patients with BC. One-sample proportion tests were performed to assess adequacy in racial representation among supportive care CTs and by intervention type. Results: Of 173 supportive care CTs, 133 (77%) trials reported race-specific data. Characteristics of supportive care CTs based on intervention type and race are shown (Table). Although no statistically significant differences in frequencies of Black participants in supportive BC CTs overall were observed compared to the US population (11% vs 12%, p= 0.40), they were underrepresented in symptom management CTs specifically (8% vs 12%, p= 0.004). When stratified based on diet/physical activity CTs, Black participants were overrepresented in the study population (18% vs 11%, p= <0.001). Asian participants were underrepresented in the overall study population compared to the US population (5% vs 7%, p= 0.01). However, within psycho-oncology CTs, there was an overrepresentation of Asian participants in the study population (21% vs 7%, p =…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free